Sunday 28 February 2016

Deadpool


Hello dear reader, Its Deadpool time. A sentence that in itself isn’t that much of a big deal but contained within those three words or, if you prefer, fifteen letters, is a game changer. There have been of course been several Superhero movies over the last few years. The film that really got the spandex ball rolling was Bryan Singers X-Men back in 2000. This was then followed very quickly by Tobey Maguire swinging through the Big Apple, faster than you can say “With great power comes endless merchandising possibilities’. Then Warner threw their hat into the ring and rebooted the ‘Batman’ franchise, with Christopher Nolan. This substantially raised the bar with regards to treating the audience with a modicum of intelligence and realising that action set pieces are all very well but it’s the script and characters that ultimately puts bums on seat. “I’m gonna make this pencil disappear…” 

Then came a long a gentlemen by the name of Kevin Feige shouting to anyone that would listen that “There’s gold in them their hills!” and launched what can arguably be described as the most successful movie series in history. So back to Deadpool and its substantial moving of the goalposts. Why is it a game changer I hear you ask? Well, my awesomely fabulous reader, the answer is quite simple. With the possible exception of ‘The Crow’, there has never been a main stream comic book film released by a studio that set out from the very start to be dark, ultra-violent and have enough bad language to make even Quentin Tarantino blush. And before anyone pipes up and tries to play either the The Punisher or Ghost Rider top trump card, I would like to just state for the record that they both suck so much they should be sponsored by Dyson, and therefore do not count!

If you’ll indulge me, I’ll just give you a quick heads up on how Deadpool ended up being greenlit in the first place. Back in 2009 Hugh Jackman had his first opportunity to ‘go solo’ and see if he could carry the weight of an X-Man film all on his lonesome. I say lonesome but there were a few other mutants thrown into the mix just to keep it interesting. There was a Gambit, a Sabretooth and even a Cyclops. It’s also memorable for the fact that it’s the first time that Deadpool, or Wade Wilson to give him his civilian name, appears on a cinema screen. The film isn’t exactly remembered as what people in polite society would call ‘good’, and even the the actor charged with bring this Deadpool to life, Ryan Reynolds, has gone on record and said that it’s a bit poo. The film itself falls a long way from being the sum of its parts. Mr Pool is stretched a long way from his comic book routes and to say it was substantially watered down for more palatable tastes, is an understatement. It did however get the ball rolling and a couple of years later Twentieth Century Fox commissioned about five minutes of test footage to see if a Deadpool film could actually be brought to the silver screen and more importantly, done well and not skimp around the edges. This test footage was then somehow ‘accidently’ leaked onto the internet and then fans all proclaimed in one voice ‘more please!’ They basically bombarded Fox, insisting that a film be made and wouldn’t you know it, persistence paid off. Fast forward to late 2014 and once again Ryan Reynolds is back and this time there’s a little gravitas about the whole operation. The Wolverine movie is ignored and this outing is treated as an origin story. 

The film itself is a breath of fresh air. It takes the Superhero rule book and throws it out of the window. It cares not one jot about keeping little jimmy happy and trying to draw in the biggest audience it can get its hands on. Deadpool is squarely aimed at the adult end of the spectrum and to be honest if little jimmy did manage to get in and watch Deadpool, he’d leave a needing about six months of therapy and have a list of ‘why’ questions that would keep even the most caring of parents reaching for the Prozac. That said there are times when Deadpool comes across as a film that doesn’t really know what it wants to be. It’s very funny, has well put together action sequences, doesn’t take itself seriously at all and has some very clever forth wall breaks. However, there are also scenes that wouldn’t look out of place in a Saw film. I got the feeling that the screenwriters, Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick, just basically decided to throw a huge amount of content at the wall and see what stuck. Tonally Deadpool doesn’t have a smooth ride from start to finish and although I would give it four out of five, it only gets there by the skin of its teeth. There will of course be people out there of completely disagree with on this and that’s fine. Opinions are fine and dandy and it doesn’t mean that I’m right and others are wrong. I suspect there will be people out there in internet land who were looking forward to this film more than Episode VII. There was a lot of pressure and expectation put on its release and it did have some fairly harsh critics to win over. As I mentioned earlier, Deapool is a breath of fresh air and could also be seen as a soft reboot for the genre. As a result of its popularity I suspect there will now be a lot of studio boardrooms, full of executives, having conversations along the lines of ‘we can do what now?’ and ‘Adults also like this stuff, who knew!’ Warner Brothers have already confirmed that the Blu-ray release for Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice will be a much more violent and darker affair than the imminent cinema release and only time will tell what the world makes of this new angle of attack when it comes to Superhero films.

Marvel has had the lion’s share of the market over the last eight years and has been merrily counting the ALL money generated from Iron Man and his pals. But like a storm moving in from the horizon, Warner Brothers are about to launch their little boat into the water and there may not be enough space for them both to play without there being casualties. Before too much longer we as a planet could find ourselves hurtling towards the Superhero event horizon, with absolutely no way of stopping it. To say nothing of there now being the possibility of each film potential having two versions available. 

But back to Deadpool. You’ll laugh, you’ll cry, you’ll almost certainly wince and it being one of them there ‘do-gooder’s in spandex’ films, you’ll also sit through the credits for what feels like an eternity, waiting for the sting thingy. This by the way the credit sting is very in keeping with the feel of Deadpool. It’s also worth pointing out that Deadpool has a great cast and a British bad guy called Francis. The Director, Tim Miller has what can best be described as an odds and sods CV but someone at Fox saw something in him with regards to potential and that gamble has paid off. Deadpool, although it does have its faults, certainly doesn’t have any issues with it production of overall visual feel and I wouldn’t be at all surprised if he’s asked to take on the directing reigns again. So in closing I’ll say this. Deadpool is one of those films that grabs your attention from the start and takes you on a ride that doesn’t really let up. It’s hard to imagine anyone other than Ryan Reynolds now playing the part and although I don’t think it passes the Bechdal test, the female characters in it aren’t just there to be rescued or viewed as eye candy. If you like your champions of the silver screen dressed in red, having a fairly strong leaning towards the effing and jeffing and a lot of comedy thrown into the mix then Mr pool and company may just be the film for you…

Twitter review:
1 portion on spandex, 67 tbsp of violence, a sprinkling of smut & a metric f%#k tonne of blood & gore. Stir and bake on Hi-Def.
#Shoop

Useful Links:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1431045/?ref_=nv_sr_1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vN6DHB6bJc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hr1YnpLiJC8
http://www.empireonline.com/movies/deadpool-2/review/

Sunday 21 February 2016

The Revenant


Hello dear reader. It’s been just over two months since I last offered up an opinion on the wonderful world that is my cinema experiences. Two long empty months with nothing to show for it other than the distant glowing reflection of all things Forcey and Skywalker. There are of course perfectly good reasons for this, of which some of you will be aware of. For those of you who aren’t, let me simply say this. Life got in the way and it needed to. It’s as simple as that…

So what do I have on offer for you this time? Well, to boil it all down to its constituent basics, The Revenant is a revenge film that stars The Great Gatsby and Bane. Now obviously there’s a little more to it than that and coming in at a shade over two and a half hours long, the Mexican director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu hasn’t scrimped on the details either. Following up on his Oscar winning ‘Birdman’ triumph of 2014, he turned his attentions towards a little known true story and with a bit of artistic licence and a sprinkling of Hollywood magic has turned in a finished product that is something of a rarity these days, an original film.  The true story in question is about Hugh Glass, played here by Mr DiCaprio, a frontiersman who is left for dead after being mauled by a bear, in South Dakota, 1823. 

It’s worth pointing out that The Revenant it not what would be described as a ‘happy happy joy joy; film. It’s bleak and deals with personal tragedy, betrayal and one man’s struggle to right some wrongs and to see justice prevail. Just think nineteenth century Batman but without the utility belt. Having said that though, what you do get for your time and money is possible one of the greatest cinematic and visually astonishing films to ever grace the silver screen. The landscape, which some would argue is a character in itself, has a perfection and resonance and is the glue that holds the story together. If the internets and more importantly, the studio publicity machine, are to be believed then there was no artificial light used during the entire shooting process. This is a little white lie as Inarritu has stated for the record that at least one camp fire scene need to be enhanced but apart from that all you see of South Dakota was filmed using the two to three hours of natural light available. This is no mean feat, especially when you consider that locations, weather and the logistics of moving a film crew into position aren’t always the easiest things to control. Another detail that the promotional machine for Twentieth Century Fox would very much like you, the viewer, to believe is, that the film does not have any computer generated imagery in it at all and Inarritu is quoted as saying “If we ended up in green-screen with coffee and everybody having a good time, everybody will be happy, but most likely the film would be a piece of shit”. Now, this is all fine and dandy until you start analysing what’s been seen. We have a meteorite hurtling through the sky, on queue and as luck would have it, heading in the right direction. The bear attack sequence, which lasts a good five minutes. There are very visceral shots of people being impaled with arrows and this isn’t done just using ‘clever camera angles’. However, my personal favourite ‘none cgi’ effect is when Mr DiCaprio rides a horse of a cliff to escape a pack of chasing Native Americans. If you’ve seen the film you’ll know exactly which scene I’m referring too and if that was done without the use of computers then Mr Inarritu, I doth my cap at your ability to not only train the greatest stunt horse in the world but also to convince, what I hope was a stunt double, to happy ride off a reasonably high precipice with only a couple of snow clad spruce trees to aim for. 

It is only fair to point out that the natural light ‘white lie’ and the computer ‘fib’ should in no way stop you from watching this film. Neither issue detract from the overall finished product at all. The film is almost flawless in its execution and when complimented by the acting talent on screen too, it’s almost certainly made itself the frontrunner for Oscar gold this year. 
Speaking of the acting talent, its two main leads Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hardy hardly put a foot wrong here. Having first worked together in Christopher Nolan’s ‘Inception’, their chemistry on screen is consummate. Although both have contrasting acting styles, they play off each other very well and both bring different qualities to the table. I think DiCaprio saw this film and its making as a very important journey he wanted to take. After having read the script He called Tom Hardy and told him that he wanted him to take the part of John Fitzgerald, the man who ultimately betrays DiCaprio’s Glass. Hardy, who was at the time attached to Suicide Squad, dropped out of that and agreed to make The Revenant. A decision that earned him a best supporting actor nod at the 2016 Oscars. 

The Revenant has over the last twelve months attained an almost mythical status throughout Hollywood as being a film that could or indeed can, lay claim to being the toughest movie shoot in history. However I suspect a certain Mr James Cameron (The Abyss or Titanic), Francis Ford Coppola (Apocalypse Now) and possibly even David Fincher (Alien 3) would have something to say about that. Tom Hardy, who apparently is a big believer is keeping the crew happy, had several onset arguments with Inarritu and is said to have chocked him out at one point after a disagreement. The Revenant was shot chronologically over an eighty day schedule, which isn’t easy in itself, however there were production problems from the outset and they had to move the entire shoot on at least three separate occasions, chasing the snow. DiCaprio’s commitment to the cause and the finished performance he deliveries is astounding and I hope he ends up with a small gold statue for his troubles. He’s definitely deserved it.

I'll finish by saying this. If you get the opportunity to watch The Revenant, I would strongly advise to you take it. It is a rare film of at times exceptional beauty and you’re unlikely to see its equal for a very long time. The subject matter won’t be to everyone’s tastes and there will be people who won’t want to watch it because of the actors in it but seek it out, all the same. It is at times unapologetically brutal and graphic but I would argue that it needs to be in order to tell the story. As to what subject Inarritu will decide to tackle next, the jury is still out, but is Birdman and The Revenant are anything to go by then you can place a large amount of money on it being original, thought provoking and will also have ‘A-list’ actors lining up around the block to audition for it. 

Twitter Review:
There are bears. There are woods & there are other assorted strange animals, but Winnie the Pooh this isn't.
#IfYouGoDownToTheWoodsToday

Useful Links:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1663202/?ref_=nv_sr_1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoebZZ8K5N0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcFLuiqDm8g
http://www.empireonline.com/movies/revenant/review/