How to make a film about Hobbits.
For best results please try and stick to the correct elements listed below.
Ingredients:
1x old wizard played by Magneto (Sir Ian Mckellen)
1x Hobbit played by Dr Watson and or Arthur Dent (Martin Freeman)
12x Dwarves including 1 who married the Vicar of Dibley (Richard Armitage), 1 who played Jekyll & Hyde (James Nesbitt), 1 who’s been in everything from Red Dwarf, Casualty and The Bill (Graham McTavish)and 1 who’s made his name playing a Vampire (Aidan Turner)
2x Hobbits we’ve seen before so you can use them to help set up the telling of the story you’re about to see (Sir Ian Holm and Elijah Wood)
1x Elf played by Mr Smith from the Matrix Films (Hugo Weaving)
1x Elf played by Queen Elizabeth (Cate Blanchett)
1x Wizard played by the man with the golden gun with Dracula tendencies (Christopher Lee)
1x Wizard played by an ex Doctor Who (Sylvester McCoy)
1x Gollum, keeper of the precious (Andy Serkis)
Method:
Find a Director who has previous experience in bringing Tolkien to the masses. New Zealanders tend to be the best if you can find one. Sign up a local company that can handle the odd effect or two. Please check first that they don’t specialise in claymation or stop motion effects. Most of what’s seen on screen will need to be digital. Also without wishing to sound to clichéd when it comes to scouting for places to shoot your grand and epic tale, it will come down to three simple words “Location, Location, Location”. You can assemble the greatest actors, write the best screenplay seen in these parts for over a decade but if you’re going to convince the world that you are actually on location in Middle Earth you can’t do it with concrete cows or electricity pylons in the background.
Once you have these components put together take the above ingredients and mix them altogether. Give yourself a solid twelve months or so to cook it perfectly and then wait for critical acclaim.
This Hobbit movie isn’t actually that bad. The problems that it has are mostly inherited from what came before. The previous lord of the rings trilogy blew audiences way, raised the bar and made a lot of money, approximately 2.9 billion dollars. It also proved that there isn’t that much that can be considered these days to be “unfilmable”.
So with very high expectations filming of the Hobbit was announced with Peter Jackson once again taking on the big chair duties again. Originally the plan was to make two films but even this raised a few eyebrows within the film world. All three books from the rings trilogy clock in at around one thousand pages, whereas the hobbit is nearer three hundred and fifty. Some of the Hollywood naysayers were adamant that there simple wasn’t enough source material for it to be stretched over two films so I can only imagine that shares in Prozac must have gone up quite considerable when Warner’s announced in the early summer of last year that at Jacksons request the story would now take place over three films, not two.
This is a four star film, not five and the reason I say this is a simple on. At the heart of this story it’s basically a tale about reclaiming a home and the treasure horded within, even if it is guarded by a dragon. There’s never any real sense of peril or that the world will end should they fail in their quest. Even when Sauron isn’t on the screen in the original films you have the ring to remind you that something very bad is happening and that all is not well. You just the sensation that if the Dwarves don’t finish their journey not a lot will change. This is a shame really but guess the Hobbit was written as a children’s story, the lord of the rings wasn’t .
I’ll finish by saying this, the Hobbit was a long time in the making and had a few hiccups before it made it to the screen. The most prominent being a change of director. Guillermo del Toro had always been Peter Jackson first choice for directing these films but after the films production getting stuck in financial wrangles he left to pursue other interests. The next two films “The Desolation of Smaug”, due in December of this year and “There and Back Again” due to hit the screens in the summer of 2014 are still very much “must see movies” and I’m sure they will be received well and be hailed as landmark films, in much the same way the first trilogy were. I just hope they are more character driven and not too reliant on visual distractions as the first one seemed to be.
Twitter review:
If you don’t like this film you don’t know what you’re Tolkien about
Useful Links:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0903624/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOGsB9dORBg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IYMgqWXH8Y
No comments:
Post a Comment