Showing posts with label Wizard. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wizard. Show all posts

Thursday, 5 January 2017

2016: My Year in Review (plus a couple of films i haven't blogged about)

2016 Scholarships
 
Hello dear reader, well it’s time to play catch up on 2016. Below you’ll find my top five films of the year and also five films that I managed to miss. I’ll also be taking the time to tell you about two films I saw towards the end of the year and didn’t have time to blog about, including the excuses why I didn't as well.
 
The first film I failed to tell the world about was Arrival. This was one of those odd films that crept up on me and that I didn’t know much about until about two months before its release date. However, once I had heard of it, it seemed to be everywhere. Directed by Denis Villeneuve, who was responsible for 2015’s Sicario and who has been given the big chair for this year’s Blade Runner sequel, it tells the tale of a potentially non-hostile alien race that ‘arrive’ on earth. Their arrival comes in the form of twelve spaceships that take up positions over various locations all over the globe and then just hover there, exactly that same way that cars don’t. The U.S. government decides that communication, not conflict is the way forward and hires the best Linguistics Professor they can get their hands on. Louise Banks, played by Amy Adams, is the Professor in question and with the help of a Theoretical Physicist Ian Donnelly, played by Jeremy Renner, they set about trying to make sure things don’t deteriorate with other governments and the ships that they are dealing with. Throw in a military operation run by Forest Whitaker, a few flash backs and some wibbly wobbly timey wimey stuff and that’s basically Arrival in a nut shell. I can’t really get into the story any further without getting heavily into spoiler territory but I would say that it’s a film that’s worth watching.
Arrival is an odd film. A lot of reviews I’ve read for it have tagged it with the ‘thinking man’s’ Sci-Fi film label. That’s a little unfair to be honest. It certainly isn’t a film that is full of flashy special effects and alien’s hell bent on world domination, like Independence Day for example. It is however a film that is character and story driven. It doesn’t waste money on frivolous things like an extensive colour pallet or creating huge sound stages that get used only once. Instead it uses rolling fields and oceans as its back drop and is also a film that doesn’t seem to be in any rush to tell its story. It will almost certainly garner Amy Adams an Oscar nod although from what I’ve read she’s ultimately likely to lose out to Natalie Portman for Jackie. To sum Arrival up I’d say that you will never have watched a Sci-fi film like it before and it will stimulate the little grey cells when you watch it. It’s also one of those rare films that almost certainly won’t get a sequel, not because it didn’t make enough money but simply because it’s a completely self-contained story. Make time to see it. You’ll be glad you did.
The second film on my tardy correspondence list is Fantastic Profits and Where to Find Them, or something like along those lines. For those of you how don’t know or for that matter don’t care. This is a film that is set in the same universe as the previous forty seven Harry Potter films. Now, I should say for the record that it may look like, given that preceding introduction, I’m not the biggest fan of J.K. Rowling and all things Voldemort, Muggle and Magic. This could not be further from the truth. I own all of the forty seven previous aforementioned films on Blu ray and not one of them is currently doubling as a coaster. My problem with these films although I consider them to be good, I just don’t see them as great. Yes I know I’m not really the demographic they’re aimed at and there’s as much chance as me jumping on the HP merchandising bandwagon as there is me being used a Vidal Sassoon model but as films judged on their own merits, they’re all three or four star films at best.
Fantastic Beasts follows the main character Newt (not the one from Aliens) Scamander and his trip to New York. Armed only with his trusted wand and with a suitcase that could quite easily give the Tardis a run for its money in the ‘open plan’ stakes, Newt finds himself very quickly embroiled in the local wizard vs No-Majs secrecy battles and before you can say “I hope nothing escapes from that case of his” lots of things, well three to be exact, have escaped and disappeared faster than a rat up an aqueduct. The film then follows Newt’s attempts to recapture these beasts and not let the general public in on the fact that there are is also some fairly dark and evil magic roaming around the Manhattan. As per usual with these films they have a great cast. To start we have Oscar winner Eddie Redmayne as the aforementioned Newt. Add to this Colin Farrell, Jon Voight, Samantha Morton, Ron Pearlman, an almost unrecognisable Ezra Miller and Johnny Depp (although I wouldn’t be at all surprised if his part is recast for the next film and other sequels that have already been green lit) and you have the makings of a great ensemble cast. My main problem with this film is its running time. Two hours and thirteen minutes isn’t exactly what you call a long film. That’s precisely the same time Rogue One had. However, Rogue one didn’t feel like twenty minutes could have been lifted out of its second act without it having any detrimental effect on its story or characters, Fantastic Beasts did. It is Rowling’s first foray into screenwriting and you’d expect her to be able to write these characters better than anyone else available, given that she created them in the first place but it did feel at times as though something was missing. Redmayne seems to spend the majority of the movie trying to do his best Hugh Grant ‘bumbling but loveable’ impression that Mr Grant had down pat for most of the previous twenty years and Colin Farrell just seems to be acting by numbers during certain parts. For those of you who are interested in this film universe I suspect you will have already parted with your hard earnt pennies and taken yourself off to your nearest multiplex to watch this film. I for one would have probably waited for the dvd release but I think seeing it on the big screen was probably a good thing. The third act is crammed with more special effects than you’d find at an Industrial Light & Magic convention and although the film wasn’t scored by John Williams, James Newton Howard had baton duties this time, it certainly filled the room I was sat in without any problems at all.
 
So, now we’ve played catch up, I can get down the best films I’ve seen this year. I thought long and hard about this, placed ads stating that I’d be willing to take bribes to include certain titles and even considered just pulling names out of a hat but In the long run I decided that honesty was the best policy and so, without further ado, I present to you my top five movies of 2016 that I thought were bestest.
 
1: Spotlight
2: Victoria
3: Arrival
4: The Big Short
5: Captain America: Civil War
 
Civil War was one of those films that shouldn’t have worked. Far too many characters to keep interesting and way to much visually to fit in, even with a running time of about two and a half hours. However not only does work, it showed that Marvel were and are leaps and bounds ahead of what DC are trying to do. If you’ve seen Batman v Superman or Suicide Squad, you’ll understand precisely what I mean. The reboot of Spider-man not only worked but pretty much stole the show and the script was sharper than a sharp thing, on national sharp day in sharp land.
The Big Short is a story about capitalism at its finest. If you can get past the fact that Christian Bale is playing the smartest person in the room, gets his hair styled at supercuts and has some pretty serious commitment issues when it comes to shoes, then you’ll probably enjoy this film. Based around the financial recession that hit back in 2008 and the subsequent collapse that followed. It tells the story of how, to quote Gordon Gekko “Greed works” and what lengths people will go to in order to make money, even when that comes at the detriment of others.
Next is Arrival and as I mentioned earlier it’s a Science Fiction film that doesn’t really like conforming to the genre it’s sitting in. It also proves that any passing aliens that do turn up on our door step should be just as scared of us as we are of them.
At number two we find Victoria, which I blogged about last year. In short it’s a two hour film about a Spanish woman who’s recently moved to Berlin. Now, that may not sound like a film you’d want to invest over one hundred and twenty minutes of your life in but when I tell you that the entire film is just one single shot and includes a night club, a bank robbery and a shootout with the police, you should change your mind. Seriously, go and watch it. It’s simple, it’s unique and it’s a piece of film making brilliance. This leads me to my film of the year.
Spotlight is a film that does something that shouldn’t really be possible. It takes a subject matter that shouldn’t be watchable, not only watchable but also compelling. The Boston Globes ‘Spotlight’ team look into allegations of child abuse in the Catholic Church. The further they look into these allegations the more apparent it becomes that there has been an extensive cover up, going back decades, in order to keep these accusations from ever seeing the light of day. Along with Keaton the cast also includes, Mark Ruffalo, Rachel McAdams, Live Schreiber, John Slattery and Stanley Tucci. If you’re not keen on plot driven stories and acting of the highest calibre then this film probably isn’t for you.  If you like your films to be a bit more ‘bang for your buck’ the closest this film comes to an action scene is when someone does some photocopying. Despite the very heavy tone and subject matter of Spotlight it’s a film that should be watched, it’s a film that should be praised and it’s a film that should be championed as much a humanly possible. It’s also worth noting that for the second year in a row Michael Keaton  has found himself playing a major part in the Best Picture Oscar winner, the first being Birdman. After several years in the wilderness it looks like Hollywood may have actually realised that Keaton can not only act but he can cat very well. Long may this revival continue…
 
Now, its excuses time. There were films that were released last year that for various reasons, namely lack of time, three week holidays to the other side of the planet and having a boat load of good TV to get through first (Game of Thrones, West World, Stranger Things, Home Under The Hammer etc) that I never got around to watching. There is of course no way I can put these in any particular order of preference but I have heard from people, whose opinion that I hold in very high regard, that some of these are simply brilliant. I do plan on rectifying the whole ‘not having seen them’ issue pronto quick but if you do have a spare evening and are at a loose end as to what to watch, may I put forth the following five films as genuine bona-fide recommendations. 
Firstly we have Hateful Eight, which is the second in a promised trilogy of westerns from Quentin Tarantino. The first of course being Django Unchained. I could speculate about the plot of Hateful Eight but having not seen it I’d just be shooting in the dark. I think I’m safe in saying it doesn’t have anything to do with the Fantastic 4 fighting their own evil clones in the middle of a Wyoming winter. I do know that as per usual, for a QT film, its cast is abounding with A-list talent. Kurt Russell, Jennifer Jason Leigh, Samuel L Jackson, Tim Roth and Bruce Dern, to name but a few.  It’s a shade over three hours long and has an eighteen certificate so I’d expect there to be quite a lot of the red stuff splattered around the screen and probably best avoided by the squeamish.
Next we have Hacksaw Ridge. Directed by Mel Gibson, which I’m sure will automatically make it a no-show for some people but if you can past the politics and religion issues then I am told that as war movies go it’s found itself nestling in quite a few well regarded critics all-time top ten in the film genre. Staring Andrew Garfield it tells the tale of U.S. army medic Desmond T Doss who served during the battle of Okinawa and refused to kill anyone. Thus becoming the first American soldier in history to win the medal of honour without firing a single shot.
Option three is Hunt for the Wilderpeople. This is a film that caught many by surprise and probably slipped past most people’s radars completely. Written and  Directed by Taika Waititi, who also took on both duties for What We Do in the Shadows, it’s a story about a rebellious kid and his foster uncle, who go missing in the New Zealand bush. These two characters, played by Julian Dennison and Sam Neil respectively have won over pretty much every reviewer that’s gone to see it and it has been repeatedly mentioned as the feel good movie of the year. It’s also worth noting that Waititi has been given the directorial reigns over Thor: Ragnarok, which is due to arrive in cinemas at the end of October. It seems like he’s building up quite the CV and it will be interesting to see what he takes on next.
Fourthly come Room. A story about a mother and son who are locked in a room. She creates a whole universe for him inside the confines of the four walled prison that they find themselves trapped in and is steadfast in her unwillingness to let that stop her from raising him to the best of her ability. They plan an escape and this brings them face-to-face with what may turn out to be the scariest thing yet: the real world. The mother is played by Brie Larson and it won her last year’s Oscar for best performance by an actress in a leading role. It also may have helped her land the part of Carol Danvers or Captain Marvel as she’s also known in the self-titled MCU film that’s due in 2019.
Lastly on my list of shame for not watching is Hell or High Water. Now I suspect I’d be right in saying that of the five films I’ve listed here, this is almost certainly going to be the one that most people will know little about or nothing about. Staring Chris Pine and Jeff Bridges, it’s a story about two brothers, one of which has just been released from prison and their struggles to raise enough money to save their ranch and pay off the mortgage attached to it. Their struggles come in the form of bank robberies and this brings them to the attention of Texas Ranger Marcus Hamilton (Bridges). On a quick side note, should you ever be offered a choice between hell or high water, always go for the high water. It has to be by far the more preferable choice. Unless of course your particular skillset doesn’t yet include floating. The more astute of you will have noticed that four out of five of those movies all start with the letter H. I can assure you that it’s all purely coincidental and that I didn’t spend all of 2016 being overtly hostile to anything that started with the letter H. I am not H’ist in any way at all.
 
So that concludes 2016 and my trips to the local picture house. I hope you enjoy these little written reviews and I also hope they entertain and occasionally raise the odd smile. I do try and keep these blogs light hearted and I don’t pretend to think that at the end of the day it’s anything other than my opinion. There will be more over the course of 2017 and I’m sure they will cover the good the bad and the indifferent. Thanks for your time and attention and as for my next blog. Keep watching the skies…

Friday, 18 November 2016

Doctor Strange




Hello dear reader. So after a brief intermission of about two months, it’s time to write one of those blog thingys and tell you all about a film a watched, whilst in Australia. The being in Australia bit isn’t really that important to the review, but it is worth stating for the record that the film in question didn’t have any extra CGI kangaroos inserted in it. Nor did it have anyone wandering around in the background, wearing those charming hats with corks hanging from them. I’m very happy to report that the film seemed to be unaltered or molested in any way at all and the audience, for the most part, were a nice bunch of Bruce’s and Sheila’s who did not encroach on my viewing pleasure at all. As you can tell from the poster above, the film in question is Marvels Doctor Strange and for those of you who are keeping score, it’s the fourteenth film set in the MCU.
Doctor Sherlock, sorry Strange, is a bit of an odd character. Prior to him becoming a superhero he is a surgeon by trade who is the best in the world at what he does. Couple that with an ego the size of Saturn and an all-encompassing attitude that is two parts ‘superiority complex’, one part ‘money fixes everything’ and a little dash of ‘extrovert’, he does come across as a hard person to like at the start. Things take a bit of a literal left turn for Strange when he crashes his car on the way to an awards dinner, being thrown in his honour. His hands, which are his stock in trade, get broken to the point of almost complete destruction and to cut a long story short, Strange can no longer perform as a surgeon, due to his inability to hold anything, let alone a scalpel, without his hands shaking uncontrollably. This obviously doesn’t go down to well with Strange. His surgical ability was the cornerstone of his powerbase and his happiness. Desperate to be allowed back into the operating theatre, Strange exhausts every avenue, looking for his golden ticket and the means to become whole again. Just as he is about to give up he is told about a patient that had been crippled and then one day waked past the doctor who had been treating him. Strange tracks this patient down and before you can say ‘one way ticket to the Far East please’ he buys a one way ticket to the Far East.
What follows is a fun and visual impressive journey into redemption and realisation that he isn’t the centre of the universe. A journey of discovery that covers the mystic arts, a bit of psychedelia and some alternative dimensions thrown in for good measure. Now to go into the plot any further than that would spoil most of the movie itself. That said, it is, for the most part, an enjoyable watch. There are a few things I would have liked to have seen done differently. Namely, the car crash is a little bit too graphic for my tastes and I suspect it may not be overly popular with parents who take their children to see it either. There’s also problem with the third act. Again, without giving away too much regarding the plot, I will say that Marvel have just reverted to ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t try to fix it’ and have based the final showdown between Strange and the film’s big bad (more of that later) around a city in peril. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not like the setup and execution is always exactly the same but since 2012 Avengers Assemble, there have only been three films in the MCU (Iron Man 3, Ant-Man & Captain America: Civil War) that haven’t had their finale based either in, around or above a majorly populated city. Funnily enough, the director of the next and last (if Hugh Jackman is to be believed) Wolverine film, James Mangold, has stated recently that, with regards to his film, now called Logan; ‘if you’re looking for a gravity defying, city block destroying, cgi fuckathon, this ain’t your movie’.
It is a testament to Kevin Feige and Marvel that their movies have, over the last eight years, garnered the reputation that they have. The fact that, for all intents and purposes, they are ‘just’ comic book movies and as such aren’t likely to win anyone an Oscar or any other notable awards for that matter. The scripts aren’t going to push back the boundaries of acting, nor are they likely to require much in the way of emotional range but that hasn’t stopped people like Benedict Cumberbatch, Tilda Swinton, Chiwetel Ejiofer and Rachel McAdams, who are all Oscar nominees, jumping on board this little celluloid special effects train. And if that wasn’t enough, you can also add Mads ‘Hannibal’ Mikklesen, Benjamin Bratt and Benedict Wong into the mix as well. However, the one acting quota where Doctor Strange does fall down and fall down spectacularly is giving its female characters something to do. Sure, Tilda Swinton plays an important part and helps anchor the movie but as far as I can remember she barely has any interaction with any other female roles, let alone talking to them and Rachel McAdams doesn’t fare much better either. Her character is at best treated like if someone had asked her if she fancied the idea of cameoing in a Marvel movie. I do have high hopes for Brie Larson in 2019’s Captain Marvel and that it won’t just be a token character /performance, stuck in the middle of a testosterone overdose, whilst a passing city succumbs to the ravages of wondering bad guy, but I guess only time will tell…
So I’ll finish off with a few other bits and pieces regarding Doctor Strange that I would like to bring to your attention. Firstly, Benedict Wong plays a character simply called Wong, which is probably just one of those unlucky coincidences but just seems very lazy screenwriting to me. Secondly, if they could actually make it I would happily go on the record and say that the cloak of levitation would be at the top of most people’s Christmas list. Thirdly, the visual effects are spectacular but I couldn’t help thinking that at times it looked like a carbon copy of Inception. Lastly the aforementioned bid bad of the movie is an interdimensional entity that is quite keen on the earth being part of his planet collection. This struck me as a bit odd that and again I’m going from memory here, so forgive me if I’ve got this wrong, but having watched Doctor Strange ‘Dormammu’ would seem to be a far more powerful foe than Thanos and has never even been mentioned, in any prior MCU conversation. Yes I know that the infinity gauntlet and the infinity stones are all heading our way and are expected to arrive in the summer of 2018, in the aptly titled Avengers: Infinity War but what’s the point of spending 8 years and several trips to the local multiplex, building up a baddie and then pull the rug out from under him, with only 18 months before he gets here, with an even more powerful and vengeful antagonist. Oh and spoiler alert, Dormammu survives in Doctor Strange so I have to assume that he we either be conveniently forgotten about, the next time the Avengers hit the big screen or possibly join forces with Mr T in the ultimate quest for Power, Prestige and Pokémon. Benedict Cumberbatch actually plays both Doctor Strange and Dormammu as well. Well I say plays, he had his face scanned and then digitally reproduced. The image was then tweaked, prodded and manipulated within an inch of its life and made to look like a an evil bobble head, who’s body is currently AWOL. Dormammu is also only on the screen for about five minutes. Prior to that the bad guy duties fall squarely on the shoulders of Mads Mikkelsen and this band of not so merry men/women. Which is fine but it left me feeling slightly cheated.
So in closing I’ll say this. 2016 has been a great year for the MCU and a solid improvement on 2015. It started with Captain America: Civil war, which I would have to put in the MCU’s top three best films. Then came Doctor Strange, which does have some problems but let’s be honest here, isn’t nearly as catastrophically bad as a certain ‘Son on Krypton vs Son of Gotham’ movie that I can’t bring myself to mention. Next year we get three, yes three, new members of the MCU to look forward to. Firstly, in April, we have Guardians of the Galaxy: Vol 2 and first impressions of that look great. Then next summer we have Spider-Man: Homecoming, in which we see Tom Holland getting his own movie, fresh from his scene stealing performance in Civil War. However, the film that I’m really looking forward to is Thor: Ragnarok. It’s directed by Taika Waititi and if you don’t know who that is shame on you! Due at the end of next October, it’s another film that seems to have assembled an amazing ensemble cast. Including, Cate Blanchet, Jeff Goldblum, Karl Urban and Sam Neil. Along with the usual suspects of Chris Hemsworth, Tom Hiddleston, Jamie Alexander, Mark Ruffalo, Anthony Hopkins and Idris Elba. Throw in a hammer for good measure and you’ve basically got the ingredients for a movie that will not only knock DC’s Justice League film out of the park. It will (hopefully) be the final nail in the coffin for Zack Snyder’s involvement in their cluttered and messy film franchise…
So go see Doctor Sherlock, sorry Strange. It’s funny, it’s flashy and it’s fashionably repetitive. Not quite a four star movie but it isn’t far off it.
Twitter Review:
2 Benedict’s, 1 Swinton, a Mads & some CGI. Doctor Strange entertains but he needs to work on his bedside manner.
#CloakSoldSeperately      

Thursday, 9 January 2014

The Desolation Of Smaug

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013) Poster
Hello dear reader, a couple of Saturdays before the Yuletide festivities kicked in and certain shops, who will remain nameless, started putting Easter eggs on their shelves I went and saw the new Hobbit film. Now for lots of different reasons I shan't bore you with, including one about a Microsoft windows update that made my keyboard ornamental as opposed to functional and another that centered around me ridding the world of dark chocolate and beer, I have been unable to commit pen to paper or in this case, fingers to keys and jot down what I thought of the film. I will now remedy this alarming oversight with a short, concise and as ever entertaining review of said film.

It starts unusually, not where we left off but with a flash back to Bree and a meeting in the prancing pony about six months before the start of the first film "An Unexpected Journey". This powwow takes place between Magneto & the Vicar of Dibleys hubby, sorry Gandalf and Thorin. They are discussing what to do about the pesky dragon that's taken up residence at Erebor and how, if ever, the dwarves will ever get to go and home. Apparently the metropolitan line just doesn't go that far. During this meeting the Arkenstone is brought up. This unique gem, that either runs on Duracell batteries or Magic (it's never really made clear in the film) will help the dwarves reclaim their home. I’m not sure how it’s supposed to work but I think it’s along the same principles as the "one ring." You know, whoever holds the stone, with great power comes great responsibility, greedo shot first, put your hand against the screen, we're not in Kanas anymore, gas mark 6, he's not the messiah he's a very naughty boy kind of deals. 
It’s during this meeting that it’s decided that a thief will be required to help get this gem back, which is where Bilbo comes in.
Just a quick aside. As and when you watch this film keep your eyes peeled as the very first person you see on screen, doing a splendid impression of bugs bunny, is the one and only director of the piece Peter Jackson. 

The film then takes us back to Bilbo "The Burglar" and this company of twelve dwarves. The bakers dirty dozen of Middle Earth if you will, still heading towards what can only described as the biggest branch of Ernest Jones I've ever seen. 
For those of you who haven't read the Hobbit I can say only this. You need to stop whatever you're doing and fix this literary omission right now. It belongs up there with the classics like Hamlet, A tale of two cities and the majestic George's marvellous medicine. 
For those of you who have you'll know what's coming. This includes (spoiler alert) a bear that's a man, who happens to hate Dwarves but hates Orcs even more. A wood that even Gandalf thinks twice about entering. A necromancer, which as far as I can tell is the equivalent of a Middle Earth Sith Lord. Also on display is Stephen Fry playing the Lord of Laketown. A role he plays to perfection.

This film seems to flow a lot more smoothly than its predecessor. There was a lot of talk, when the announcement came that Peter Jackson was taking a three hundred and thirty'ish page novel and then stretching out over three instalments, that it would make it very thin on the ground when it came to plot and story but with the inclusion of the appendices from other Tolkien books thrown in for good measure Mr Jackson seems to have pulled it off. Even bringing some characters back from The Lord of the Rings trilogy has paid off. It's a credit to the screenplay and its direction that a film that clocks in at two hours and 40 minutes feels like a movie half its length. In fact when the credits started to roll I had to look at my watch to double check the time. 

Now I can and will say that you get a lot more bang for your buck in the way of action with The Desolation of Smaug. There are some truly amazing set pieces here, including an arachnophobics worst nightmare brought to life. Made even more jolting if there happens to be a set of 3D glasses perched across your nose. An escape from the elves in barrels that puts any ride at Chessington World of Adventures or Alton Park to shame and a battle under the mountain that involves one of the biggest games of side and seek you're ever likely to see. 
My biggest issue with the film and I am really “nit picking” here is that Smaug doesn’t really get desolated at all. In fact the film ends with him basically getting the upper hand over everyone. I suspect given the effort that’s been put in to bring him to life, and I’ll be honest here you won’t see a better CGI dragon this side of the trilogies conclusion, Smaug will have a big part to play in the last film “There and Back Again.” This would be a big departure from the book as he kicks the bucket, hops the twig, expires, sleeps with the fishes, has bought the farm, gone belly up and also died about two thirds of the way through the novel. It’s actually Smaugs death causes the fight for the treasure and the battle of the five armies.  In closing I’ll say this. If the first film put you off and you felt disappointed (I know I did) this one redeems the franchise very well and would definitely be worth your time, money and trouble to go and see it.   

Twitter Review:
Smaug plays it smug. Watson plays with his ring and the mountain has more gold than Big Mac has Calories in it
#DragonsBarrels&Burglars

Useful Links:
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001392/?ref_=tt_ov_dr
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPVWy1tFXuc

Friday, 18 January 2013

The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey

How to make a film about Hobbits.
For best results please try and stick to the correct elements listed below.

Ingredients:
1x    old wizard played by Magneto (Sir Ian Mckellen)
1x    Hobbit played by Dr Watson and or Arthur Dent (Martin Freeman)
12x  Dwarves including 1 who married the Vicar of Dibley (Richard Armitage), 1 who played Jekyll & Hyde (James Nesbitt), 1 who’s been in everything from Red Dwarf, Casualty and The Bill (Graham McTavish)and 1 who’s made his name playing a Vampire (Aidan Turner)
2x    Hobbits we’ve seen before so you can use them to help set up the telling of the story you’re about to see (Sir Ian Holm and Elijah Wood)
1x    Elf played by Mr Smith from the Matrix Films (Hugo Weaving)
1x    Elf played by Queen Elizabeth  (Cate Blanchett)
1x    Wizard played by the man with the golden gun with Dracula tendencies (Christopher Lee)
1x    Wizard played by an ex Doctor Who (Sylvester McCoy)
1x    Gollum, keeper of the precious (Andy Serkis)

Method:
Find a Director who has previous experience in bringing Tolkien to the masses. New Zealanders tend to be the best if you can find one. Sign up a local company that can handle the odd effect or two. Please check first that they don’t specialise in claymation or stop motion effects. Most of what’s seen on screen will need to be digital. Also without wishing to sound to clichéd when it comes to scouting for places to shoot your grand and epic tale, it will come down to three simple words “Location, Location, Location”. You can assemble the greatest actors, write the best screenplay seen in these parts for over a decade but if you’re going to convince the world that you are actually on location in Middle Earth you can’t do it with concrete cows or electricity pylons in the background.
Once you have these components put together take the above ingredients and mix them altogether. Give yourself a solid twelve months or so to cook it perfectly and then wait for critical acclaim.

This Hobbit movie isn’t actually that bad. The problems that it has are mostly inherited from what came before. The previous lord of the rings trilogy blew audiences way, raised the bar and made a lot of money, approximately 2.9 billion dollars. It also proved that there isn’t that much that can be considered these days to be “unfilmable”.
So with very high expectations filming of the Hobbit was announced with Peter Jackson once again taking on the big chair duties again. Originally the plan was to make two films but even this raised a few eyebrows within the film world. All three books from the rings trilogy clock in at around one thousand pages, whereas the hobbit is nearer three hundred and fifty. Some of the Hollywood naysayers were adamant that there simple wasn’t enough source material for it to be stretched over two films so I can only imagine that shares in Prozac must have gone up quite considerable when Warner’s announced in the early summer of last year that at Jacksons request the story would now take place over three films, not two.

This is a four star film, not five and the reason I say this is a simple on. At the heart of this story it’s basically a tale about reclaiming a home and the treasure horded within, even if it is guarded by a dragon. There’s never any real sense of peril or that the world will end should they fail in their quest. Even when Sauron isn’t on the screen in the original films you have the ring to remind you that something very bad is happening and that all is not well. You just the sensation that if the Dwarves don’t finish their journey not a lot will change. This is a shame really but guess the Hobbit was written as a children’s story, the lord of the rings wasn’t .

I’ll finish by saying this, the Hobbit was a long time in the making and had a few hiccups before it made it to the screen. The most prominent being a change of director. Guillermo del Toro had always been Peter Jackson first choice for directing these films but after the films production getting stuck in financial wrangles he left to pursue other interests.  The next two films “The Desolation of Smaug”, due in December of this year and “There and Back Again” due to hit the screens in the summer of 2014 are still very much “must see movies” and I’m sure they will be received well and be hailed as landmark films, in much the same way the first trilogy were. I just hope they are more character driven and not too reliant on visual distractions as the first one seemed to be.

Twitter review:
If you don’t like this film you don’t know what you’re Tolkien about

Useful Links:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0903624/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOGsB9dORBg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IYMgqWXH8Y